Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act
One of the most enjoyable facets of the annual Beyond Budgeting Round Table (North America) conference, which took place in San Francisco last month, is the side discussions that take place among members, presenters, and other attendees.
John Boyd’s name inevitably crops up in some of these chats.
Boyd was a colonel in the U.S. Air Force and a highly influential military strategist whose insights also apply to business strategy. He devised the “OODA Loop,” first as an approach to air-to-air combat and then later as a much broader military strategy.
The acronym stands for “Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act,” and it helps illustrate one of the keys to the success of the Beyond Budgeting model.
Boyd coined the term when he discovered how U.S. pilots in slower planes with less powerful weapons won decisive victories against a better-equipped enemy during the Korean War. It turned out that the U.S. pilots outperformed their opponents in the areas of observation, orientation, decision-making, and action. In other words, they were quicker to assess the conditions and respond accordingly. Put another way, they adapted and innovated better, which is something all companies need to do today. And many are seeking to “out-OODA” their competitors by introducing Beyond Budgeting principles.
If you’re curious about OODA Loops, several books have been published on Boyd and his model, including this one.
Take a look at your management decision-making process. How fast does it allow you to take advantage of opportunities or respond to key risks? One reason organizations need to move beyond budgets is their slow response to new risks and opportunities. Does your organization remain stuck in an annual response mode? How will it survive in today’s world, which requires lightning-quick responses? ###







June 15th, 2009 at 11:57 am
Actually, Boyd often emphasized that the OODA Loop wasn’t so much about speed as it was about tempo. I’m writing my dissertation on Boyd’s thinking and how it could be applied to counterinsurgency. He was particularly interested in the offense, as practiced especially by Blitzers (the Germans in France in May 1940, the Americans in Iraq in April 2003) and by insurgents (Lawrence of Arabia, Mao Zedong). He said much less about how to counter a blitzkrieg or an insurgency, but surely there must be an application there. What good is a theory that works only when you’re playing offense? Blue skies! — Dan Ford
June 16th, 2009 at 11:20 pm
Dan, Thanks for providing the additional insight on Boyd. I would appreciate you continuing to share your insights from the research on your dissertation. I am currently reading Chet Richards book Certain to Win: The Strategy of john Boyd, Applied o Business. It is interesting to see how Boyd’s insights can be applied to business.
As I write this I am watching how the uprising in Iran will turn. The fundamentalist regime in power is trying to stop the uprising but their moves to stiffle the communications and free press, the power of faster communications keeps getting pictures and stories on to YouTube. Their faster communication techniques are a communication blitzkrieg.
What do these new communication tools mean for new business models? I will look for lessons for counterinsurgency.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment:
Register Here or Log in Here.
Big Fat Finance Blogs
Advertisement
Recent Posts
Archives
Your Account
Archived Categories
Subscribe